Merits and demerits of scientific advancements

Merits and Demerits Prof.

Merits and demerits of scientific advancements

Some would say that discovery and invention are our defining characteristics as human beings. As central as they may be to our identity, however, science and technology often come into conflict with other fundamental aspects of our nature: Depending on how scientific and technological advancements impact our lives as individuals or our society as a whole, the human drive to know and create can be either our greatest asset or our greatest liability.

There is no doubt that scientific progress and technological advancement have provided many benefits to mankind. It is hard to think of an aspect of our lives that has not benefited.

We wake up to an alarm going off precisely when we want it to; we turn on the television and instantly find out what has been happening across the world; we pour ourselves coffee from a country we will probably never see; we drive to work across a distance that would have been unthinkable a century ago -- all of these conveniences are thanks to technological advances.

Some, however, say that these conveniences come at too high a price. Wilson uses the example of the car to explore and counter the arguments against technological advancement. He characterizes the tension between car advocates and car detractors as "a debate between private benefits and public goods" Those against the widespread use of cars point to the damage done to the environment, local economies, urban communities, and interpersonal relationships by the prevalence of private automobiles.

Your Answer

Wilson, however, defends the car by pointing to the "convenience, flexibility, and privacy" that a personal automobile allows its driver Wilson's article exposes an interesting quality of scientific and technological progress: Though she does not address it directly, Denise Grady illustrates this attribute of technology in a much more serious manner in her article "Struggling Back from War's Once-Deadly Wounds.

The veteran owes his life to many scientific and technological advancements -- sophisticated armor, advanced emergency medicine, and cutting-edge reconstructive techniques.

If seen from his point-of-view, progress in this area is clearly a good thing. Grady does point out, however, that these advancements have societal implications, and not all of them may be considered good. No one would say that medical advances should be halted or that soldiers should not be protected by the most sophisticated gear possible.

However, if viewed purely from a financial perspective, these advances can create expenses that are difficult to bear. It could be argued that what actually determines the moral status of a scientific or technological advance is not the drive towards progress but how far this drive is taken.

A famous example of this can be seen in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. Frankenstein is enamored with knowledge and the power that comes with it, but is soon overcome by an insatiable lust for ever more progress until he sets his sights on the border between life and death: No one can conceive the variety of feelings which bore me onwards, like a hurricanein the first enthusiasm of success.

Life and death appeared to me ideal bounds, which I should first break through, and pour a torrent of light into the dark world. Frankenstein succeeds and his monster comes to life, he has a guttural reaction of horror that never quite materializes into a sense of guilt.

The reader knows, however, that Frankenstein has overstepped some limit to the advancement of science. Some would say that Frankenstein tried too hard to be like God -- that the creation of life and the abolishment of death should stay in the hands of a higher power.

Though Shelley wrote her novel almost two hundred years ago, the moral question she poses about the limits of science are still relevant today in arguments about stem cell research and cloning.

If the moral limits of science do exist, how are we to know when we've reached them until, as in the situation with Dr.

Frankenstein and his monster, it is too late and they have already been crossed? In his essay My Bionic Quest for "Bolero," Michael Chorost recounts his own experience with pushing the boundaries of science.

Chorost was born with degenerative hearing problems that eventually outstripped the ability of standard hearing aids to help him. In his desperation, he sought a more sophisticated treatment. Doctors equipped him with cochlear implants, computer devices that replicated the activity of the aural nerves between his ears and his brain.

CBSE Vs ICSE syllabus – Which is better and why?

The results were impressive; Chorost admits that, after he was given the implants, "[his] hearing was better than it had ever been" But this was not enough for Chorost -- he wanted not just to hear, but to hear with such natural precision that he could recognize all of the richness and texture of a complicated orchestral piece.

This became, in a way somewhat reminiscent of Dr.

Merits and demerits of scientific advancements

Frankenstein, his single-minded pursuit.Jul 31,  · My first day at college is an important event of my life. To me it is an unforgettable day. During my school days. I had a glimpse of college life from my elder brothers and sisters.

"+relatedpoststitle+"

Jun 28,  · From the "horseless carriage" to the internet, technology advances continue to transform the business world. The fallout from these changes is often unexpected. Merits and Demerits of Shakespeare In Preface to Shakespeare, In terms of technological advancements and scientific achievements India is second to none.

India belongs to the select group of countries who have developed indigenous nuclear technology. India is among the few countries which have developed ballistic missiles. 10 Advantages and Disadvantages of Cloning Cloning used to be something that was only in science fiction novels and films, but in today’s modern world, it is here and it is one of the most controversial topics among the science and medical communities.

The Mary Suetopia trope as used in popular culture. Also known as a Straw Utopia, everything is perfect in this ideologically pure country.

In addition to Rose's comment about the badly constructed second sentence it's not a sentence at allthere are a few other things to consider.
Essay: Advantages and Disadvantages of Science and Technology … | 5 Pages Nikhil Shelke Member Level: This article gives a brief insight of the merits and demerits of each of the syllabus.

Everyone lives a . Advantages and Disadvantages of Science. Technology is the skill to utilize scientific knowledge. Technology has improved out way of life in many ways. Science and technology is a term which deals with the relationship between science and technology.

Advancements in science and technology like the inventions of the telephone to the.

Merits and Demerits of Science English Essays