Barbara lazear ascher essay analysis

Finding a good heart in this world is like finding a gem on a New York City sidewalk. Barbara Lazear Ascher was wrote an essay documenting a lovely story of an act of compassion, as well as sharing her own views on the issue.

Barbara lazear ascher essay analysis

Phoebe believes that if someone does a good deed where they get nothing in return, then they have performed a selfless act. Using a variety of writing techniques, she makes her readers wonder if people do good deeds simply to do good, or because they get something out of it.

One of the techniques she uses is anecdotes. She tells two stories of homeless men, one of them being about a homeless man receiving money from a mother pushing a stroller near him, and the other about a bakery owner who gives a homeless man food when he comes in.

She does a beautiful job of painting a picture so the readers can really put themselves in the situation and truly think about why the people do what they do. And the fact that she is so detailed, describing the bread and coffee, or describing how the mother reacts Barbara lazear ascher essay analysis the homeless man, only makes the readers think more.

Her details of the mother gripping the stroller tightly after the homeless man sets eyes on her baby really give the reader an idea of what she may be thinking. The telling of the stories also gives the readers something to relate to, rather than just her talking about why people do good deeds.

People are given an example to relate their thoughts to, and they can also use those examples to connect to their own experiences. Ascher also has a way of asking her audience questions.

But it could also be because she wants him out of her shop. Or does she simply want to rid her shop of his troublesome presence? The use of questioning her audience also mimics the way people think. Another thing that Ascher does is her way of writing.

In other words, her tone. She strays away from a comedic tone, and focuses on a more serious and curious one. Since she avoids humor, it allows her to be taken more seriously. And her way of presenting her curiosity of why people do good things is absorbed by her audience as a genuine question they take into consideration and begin to really care about.

So, along with her questioning yet serious tone, her readers truly engage her ideas, and come to think the same way she does; that people, whether it seems like it or not, appear to have something in it for themselves.

Barbara Lazear Ascher used a few tricks to get her readers to take her seriously and to make them think, but the most perplexing part of her writing is how she feels. While she never outright states why she thinks people do good, one can infer that she takes the side of Mr.

Whether it be a protective mother trying to keep a scary looking homeless man at bay, or the runner of a bakery trying to keep the peace with the neighborhood hobo, it appears as if she is questioning why people would just do something nice, like it was inhuman.

Because, just like Joey, she believes that all acts are done out of some gain for the doer, never just for the sake of doing something nice.On compassion barbara lazear ascher essay.

essayeur automobile psa hadees about eid milad un nabi essay phd dissertation number of pages lost in translation poem analysis essays where to buy essay papers common app essay breakdown edible bird nest research paperEssay on dr martin luther king goals after mba essay common app essay length.

Barbara Lazear Ascher is a former attorney and the author of four books of non-fiction, PLAYING AFTER DARK (Doubleday), THE HABIT OF LOVING (Random House), LANDSCAPE WITHOUT GRAVITY: A MEMOIR OF GRIEF, (Viking Penguin), and most recently, DANCING IN THE DARK: ROMANCE, YEARNING AND THE SEARCH FOR .

On Compassion Analysis | Alyssa Podskalan

“On Compassion” by Barbara Lazear Ascher The purpose of this essay is to question the readers. Ascher wants the audience to analyze themselves to determine the reason behind why people show kindness, whether it is out of fear, pity, or compassion.

Micayla Arndt 3rd Hour “Barbara Lazear Ascher - On Compassion” Rhetorical Analysis Compassion is seen around the world. Or so it’s thought. Barbara Ascher questions whether or not compassion is real or if it’s driven by fear in her essay “On Compassion.”She takes an attitude that it is fear-driven, and tries to sway the reader to think as she does.

Barbara Lazear Ascher.

Barbara lazear ascher essay analysis

Former NEW YORK TIMES columnist, Editorial Director of Delphinium Books, teacher and attorney, Barbara Lazear Ascher is author of four books of non-fiction, PLAYING AFTER DARK (essays) (Doubleday), THE HABIT OF LOVING (essays) (Random House), LANDSCAPE WITHOUT GRAVITY (Memoir) (Viking, .

Barbara Lazear Ascher was wrote an essay documenting a lovely story of an act of compassion, as well as sharing her own views on the issue. By using certain rhetorical devices, an essay can come alive and truly speak to an audience.

Barbara lazear ascher essay analysis